Comprehensive Analysis of Calendar Effects
October 12, 2005 - Calendar Effects
…calendar effects used to be but mostly aren’t any more.
October 12, 2005 - Calendar Effects
…calendar effects used to be but mostly aren’t any more.
October 3, 2005 - Big Ideas
…Professor Sornette’s attempt to model one equity market via diligent analysis of similarities to another equity market during a different time does not work, perhaps because the model is simplistically behavioral or because randomness dominates predictability.
September 30, 2005 - Value Premium
…because mean reversion of price-to-book ratios outpaces reinvestment of earnings, value stocks outperform growth stocks.
September 29, 2005 - Individual Gurus, Investing Expertise
…Warren Buffett’s consistently high level of outperformance challenges the Efficient Markets Hypothesis.
September 28, 2005 - Investing Expertise
…sophisticated and experienced investors/traders avoid most of the bad effects of the disposition bias. Trading practice helps.
September 26, 2005 - Big Ideas
…noise generally swamps signal (true outperformance or underperformance) in financial markets, and in life generally.
September 16, 2005 - Investing Expertise
…conflicts from the brokerage business (not investment banking) play an important role in shaping analyst forecasting behavior.
September 14, 2005 - Momentum Investing
…focusing on stocks with both high six-month momentum and rapidly increasing six-month momentum offers significant excess returns.
September 7, 2005 - Value Premium
In their August 2005 paper entitled “Value Versus Growth: Stochastic Dominance Criteria”, Abhay Abhyankar, Keng-Yu Ho and Huainan Zhao apply stochastic dominance techniques to assess the relative performance of value and growth investment strategies in U.S. equity markets over the past half century. These techniques: (1) compare entire return distributions (not just means or medians);… Keep Reading
September 6, 2005 - Individual Investing
…individual investors are systematic stock trading losers; institutions, systematic winners. Individual investors may well be relatively overconfident (despite lack of investing education) and thrill-seeking compared to institutional investors.