Objective research to aid investing decisions

Value Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for December 2024 (Final)
Cash TLT LQD SPY

Momentum Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for December 2024 (Final)
1st ETF 2nd ETF 3rd ETF

Timing Bitcoin with SMAs

| | Posted in: Currency Trading

Are simple moving averages (SMA) useful for timing difficult-to-value Bitcoin? In their January 2018 paper entitled “Bitcoin: Predictability and Profitability Via Technical Analysis”, Andrew Detzel, Hong Liu, Jack Strauss, Guofu Zhou and Yingzi Zhu investigate the use of 5-day, 10-day, 20-day, 50-day or 100-day SMAs to predict Bitcoin returns. Specifically, they test a trading strategy that holds Bitcoins (cash) when current Bitcoin price is above (below) a selected SMA. They assume cash earns the U.S. Treasury bill (T-bill) yield. Using daily Bitcoin prices and T-bill yield, along with data for other variables/assets for comparison, during July 18, 2010 through December 12, 2017, they find that:

  • Buying and holding Bitcoin earns annualized daily excess (relative to T-bill yield) return 224%, with annualized volatility 111%, Sharpe ratio 2.0 and maximum drawdown -89.5%.
  • Bitcoin returns are predictable using any of the price SMAs tested, such that the simple trading strategy described above:
    • Has gross annualized returns in the range 203%-216%, with annualized volatilities in the range 83.8%-97.0%.
    • Has gross annualized Sharpe ratios that decrease systematically from 2.6 for a 5-day SMA to 2.2 for a 100-day SMA .
    • Suppresses gross maximum drawdown to the range -70.3% for 50-day and 100-day SMAs to -66.4% for a 5-day SMA.
    • Has breakeven Bitcoin-cash switching frictions increasing systematically from 1.1% for a 5-day SMA to 4.5% for a 100-day SMA.
  • Trading strategy performance is robust for the first and second halves of the sample period.
  • The same trading strategy also beats buy-and-hold on a gross basis for the NASDAQ Composite Index during 1996 through 2005 when dot-com stocks are hard to value, increasing gross annualized Sharpe ratio from 0.25 for the index to the range 0.42-0.71 and suppressing maximum drawdown -77.9% for the index to as low as -25.7%.
  • It is arguable that investors trying to interpret prices cause short-term trending for hard-to-value assets.

In summary, evidence indicates that SMAs are effective timing tools, on a gross basis, for hard-to-value assets such as Bitcoin.

Cautions regarding findings include:

  • Reported returns, Sharpe ratios and maximum drawdowns are gross, not net. Bitcoin to date has exhibited long execution times and large trading frictions, potentially exceeding the breakeven frictions noted above.
  • Bitcoin market depth may not have supported large dollar trades across much of the sample period.
  • Testing multiple strategy variations on the same sample introduces data snooping bias, such that the best-performing variation overstates expectations.
Login
Daily Email Updates
Filter Research
  • Research Categories (select one or more)